Insurance agency M&A set record pace, but organic growth stays flat

After mergers and acquisitions activity stagnated in 2013, agent-broker acquisitions in the first half of 2014 have now surpassed the historic high levels seen in early 2012. The 165 announced M&A transactions of insurance agencies in the U.S. and Canada so far this year represent a 40% jump over the same period in 2013. It was the most active first-half period since OPTIS Partners began tracking this information in 2008. Further, the level of M&A transactions in 2014 is second only to the 181 deals announced in the second half of 2012.

Health care reform has influenced M&A activity for employee benefit brokers. In order to access and provide added value and related ACA resources to clients, certain firms were motivated to sell in order to affiliate with a larger organization. On the other hand, some acquirers viewed the employee benefit business and particularly small accounts (under 50 lives and/or under 100 lives) cautiously, creating push back in deal flow or pricing.

While the distribution of M&A activity among the four major business focuses — retail property & casualty, employee benefits and life/financial services, P&C combined with benefits and other (wholesale including MGA/MGU, TPA ) — accounted for an equal spread of announced transactions in 2008, since that time, only P&C based firms have increased. Each of the other categories has dropped. 

What’s more, organic growth has stagnated for agent-broker businesses, according to Reagan Consulting. Independent insurance agents and brokers reported median organic growth of 5.8% for the second quarter of 2014, a dip from 6.2% reported for the first quarter of 2014 and from 6.9% in the second quarter of 2013, as measured by the Reagan Consulting Organic Growth and Profitability (OGP) survey. Benefits growth, in particular, decreased to 4.6% in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the 5.5% growth rate of Q2 2013.

"Although a 5.8% organic growth rate is still a healthy result, this makes the fourth straight quarter organic growth has remained flat or declined," says Kevin Stipe, president of Reagan Consulting, a management consulting and M&A advisory firm for the insurance distribution system.

‘Prolonged active period’ ahead

Another impetus to increased M&A activity comes from the increasing retirement of baby boomers from the workforce. Reflective of America’s demographics, baby boomer principals are commonplace at agency-brokerage businesses.

“It looks like the first half of 2014 is the start of a prolonged active period for agent-broker M&A transactions,” says Timothy J. Cunningham, managing director of OPTIS, an investment banking and financial consulting firm specializing in the insurance industry. “The agency-brokerage business is awash with baby boomer principals. It’s estimated that more than 30% of all the equity in the system is owned by them. The industry has not adequately addressed perpetuation/succession planning. Without a sound perpetuation plan in place, the only option for many of aging principals will be to sell to a third party — often PE-backed and public brokers — to capitalize the value of their agency.”

The private-equity backed and public brokers will be front and center to make many of these transactions. And, according to OPTIS research, PE-backed firms continue their dominance as the most active buyer group. PE-backed firms were the most active buyers year-to-date, accounting for 67 agency purchases. They were followed by privately-owned brokers (54 deals), publicly-held brokers (27 deals), banks (nine deals) and insurance companies/ others (eight deals).

There were a few major traditional transactions announced and/or closed in the first-half of 2014, including:

  • Marsh McLennan Agency in February acquired San Diego-based Barney & Barney.
  • Canada-based Noraxis Capital Corporation sold to Gallagher in May, although the transaction closed in July.
  • Marsh McLennan Agency in May acquired Senn Dunn of Greensboro, N.C. 

 

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Healthcare reform Benefit plan design
MORE FROM EMPLOYEE BENEFIT NEWS