[IMGCAP(1)]

WASHINGTON | Thu Aug 16, 2012 2:43 am EDT (Reuters) — Mitt Romney wants to change the U.S. tax code’s treatment of health care costs, but his vice presidential pick is one step ahead: Paul Ryan has proposed a plan to scrap a generations-old tax break involving the employer-based system enjoyed by millions of working Americans.

While much attention has been focused on Ryan’s proposals for changing the Medicare health plan for the elderly, the tax health care exclusion affects three times as many Americans and is one of the costliest tax breaks at up to $200 billion a year.

Most working Americans today get their health insurance through their employers and pay no taxes on the benefits. But self-employed people have to get health care on the open market, a situation that Romney has framed as unfair.

In 2010, Ryan advocated moving away from the employer-based system and adopting a set of capped tax credits that Americans would get to cover their health care costs.

“At the heart of the problem is the federal tax exclusion for employer-provided health coverage,” Ryan wrote in a policy document. “Ownership of health insurance must be shifted away from third parties to those who are actually using it.”

The Ryan campaign did not respond to a Reuters’ request for comment.

The tax exclusion for employer-provided health care costs the U.S. Treasury in the range of $100 billion to $200 billion a year. That makes it one of the biggest tax breaks, along with the deductions for mortgage interest and charitable giving.

Since former Massachusetts Governor Romney has been vague on the subject, Democrats have been only too eager to use Ryan’s ideas to fill in the blanks before the November 6 election.

The health care tax exclusion “is the backbone of how we cover 150 million Americans in our health care system,” said Neera Tanden, president of the liberal Center for American Progress and top domestic adviser to Obama during his 2008 campaign. She called Ryan's credits proposal a “radical” change.

Ryan has proposed the credits in several venues, including his 2010 policy manifesto, the “A Roadmap for America’s Future.”

Moving away from the tax exclusion could raise health care costs for workers if, instead, they were to get tax credit, even some backers of the plan say.

“If you were sicker, you’d be stuck with more of the bill,” said Will McBride, an economist with Tax Foundation, which backs market-based policies. “That is where the efficiency comes from; it puts a cap on the subsidy.”

Ryan’s plan sets up high-risk pools at the state level to help those who may be denied coverage because of pre-existing conditions like cancer, but costs could still rise for some sicker patients under the tax credits approach.

Many conservative policy experts favor the tax credit idea, in the belief that making consumers pay more of their health care expenses will curb health cost inflation. Health care spending has been rising faster than overall inflation for many years and was a major driver of the historic 2010 health care overhaul backed by President Barack Obama’s and his fellow Democrats.

Most Republican lawmakers want to repeal that law. Romney agrees, but has not spelled out how he would handle the health care tax exclusion.

“What I would do is level the playing field and say individuals can buy insurance on the same tax-advantaged basis that businesses can buy insurance,” Romney said at a campaign event in Orlando in June.

Avik Roy, a Romney adviser and a fellow at the Manhattan Institute think tank, predicted the candidate would likely back proposals similar to those offered by Ryan. “I would expect if the Romney administration were in power and something along these lines came out, then Romney would sign it,” said Roy, who stressed he was not speaking for the campaign.

Ryan’s plan would give a tax credit of $2,300 for individuals and $5,700 for families to pay for health care coverage, according to Ryan’s Roadmap. Patients could apply the credit to employer plans and companies could still claim the benefit as a business expense.

An advantage of the system would be that it could provide universal access and let patients shop for coverage. However, former Obama adviser Tanden said the credits would not cover all medical costs, so more people would be uninsured.

 (Additional reporting by David Morgan; editing by Kevin Drawbaugh)

© 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

Register or login for access to this item and much more

All Employee Benefit Adviser content is archived after seven days.

Community members receive:
  • All recent and archived articles
  • Conference offers and updates
  • A full menu of enewsletter options
  • Web seminars, white papers, ebooks

Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access